taro
tarot
silver
jewelry
bracelets
rings
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Monday, August 10, 2009
Logic is dependent on surroundings in all n dimensions. Extrapolating one's seemingly flawless logic into other untested domains can generate loopholes ( failures / folds in the logic) that are later explained as phenomena. This "phenomena" may seem to follow a logic of it's own. (Which would be a logic of the folds in the first logic) Ultimately this would bring us to a more complex set of logic that would seem to include all the phenomena.
This process will continue as extrapolating to more domains. Some point before the entire universe is considered one would encounter a contradiction, since no logic can be both complete and consistent. (Kurt Gödel in 1931) However, perhaps we can develop a logic for similar logics. Our concern is what is useful & perhaps generate a logic of logic's. How do local logic's interact? Are there rules for adjacency?
This process will continue as extrapolating to more domains. Some point before the entire universe is considered one would encounter a contradiction, since no logic can be both complete and consistent. (Kurt Gödel in 1931) However, perhaps we can develop a logic for similar logics. Our concern is what is useful & perhaps generate a logic of logic's. How do local logic's interact? Are there rules for adjacency?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)